Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove more SGML tabs.

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove more SGML tabs.
Date: 2011-02-10 14:29:43
Message-ID: 1297348129-sup-2350@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of jue feb 10 07:58:16 -0300 2011:

> One thing I was thinking of was that we could add a global make
> maintainer-check target (a name I picked up from other projects) which
> would run various source code sanity checks. Besides the SGML tabs
> issue, my favourite would be duplicate_oids. Maybe if we could find a
> third use case, we'd have a quorum for implementing this.

The c++ headers thing? Or the compiles-in-isolation test for headers?

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message User Sas 2011-02-10 15:34:07 slony1-ctl - slony-ctl: No more need to reference $FILE
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-02-10 14:25:12 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update docs on building for Windows to accomodate current realit

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2011-02-10 14:30:14 Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2011-02-10 14:25:28 Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting