From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, fgp(at)phlo(dot)org, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Error code for "terminating connection due to conflict with recovery" |
Date: | 2011-02-01 20:25:35 |
Message-ID: | 1296591935.1779.10768.camel@ebony |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 11:43 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > Here's the basic patch, will work on the refactoring if no objections.
>
> ResolveRecoveryConflictWithDatabase works when you're not in recovery?
> That seems pretty fragile at best. In any case, this is a 9.2 feature
> at the earliest, please do not expect people to spend time on it now.
Err, no. Sorry if that wasn't clear.
The patch works but requires refactoring, which I referred to above.
What is now called ResolveRecoveryConflictWithDatabase() would be
changed to a name that makes sense in both normal running and recovery.
That seemed so obvious that I wouldn't be leaving it like that, so I
just referred to that indirectly, which was confusing.
That allows me to refactor out the code that we just spent too long
discussing, so I was hoping to do that in this release. I wasn't
expecting anybody else to spend time on it since it is simple and clear.
I'll add it to 9.2.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thom Brown | 2011-02-01 20:26:34 | Re: Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries |
Previous Message | Christian Ullrich | 2011-02-01 19:49:57 | Re: Authentication Enhancement Proposal |