Re: Crypto

From: Marcos Luis Ortiz Valmaseda <mlortiz(at)uci(dot)cu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Crypto
Date: 2009-09-19 17:27:00
Message-ID: 1295954822.1118611253381220855.JavaMail.root@ucimail4.uci.cu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I think the same, These are not arguments to include crypto on the core, due to then all users have to think on this aspect to build a simple database, so we would be obligating to the users to use this module.

I´d let this module on the contrib

Regards

"The hurry is enemy of the success: for that reason.......Be patient"

Ing. Marcos L. Ortiz Valmaseda
Línea Soporte y Despliegue
Centro de Tecnologías de Almacenamiento y Análisis de Datos (CENTALAD)

Linux User # 418229
PostgreSQL User
http://www.postgresql.org
http://www.planetpostgresql.org/
http://www.postgresql-es.org/

----- Mensaje original -----
De: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Para: "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
CC: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "PG Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Enviados: Sábado, 19 de Septiembre 2009 6:33:36 GMT -10:00 Hawai
Asunto: Re: [HACKERS] Crypto

David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:50:35AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> What benefit would we gain from making general crypto part of the
>> core?

> People may wish to encrypt things in the database.

That is not an argument why it has to be in core rather than an add-on.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2009-09-19 17:48:13 Re: WIP: generalized index constraints
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-09-19 17:21:10 Standalone backends run StartupXLOG in an incorrect environment