From: | Marcos Luis Ortiz Valmaseda <mlortiz(at)uci(dot)cu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Crypto |
Date: | 2009-09-19 17:27:00 |
Message-ID: | 1295954822.1118611253381220855.JavaMail.root@ucimail4.uci.cu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I think the same, These are not arguments to include crypto on the core, due to then all users have to think on this aspect to build a simple database, so we would be obligating to the users to use this module.
I´d let this module on the contrib
Regards
"The hurry is enemy of the success: for that reason.......Be patient"
Ing. Marcos L. Ortiz Valmaseda
Línea Soporte y Despliegue
Centro de Tecnologías de Almacenamiento y Análisis de Datos (CENTALAD)
Linux User # 418229
PostgreSQL User
http://www.postgresql.org
http://www.planetpostgresql.org/
http://www.postgresql-es.org/
----- Mensaje original -----
De: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Para: "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
CC: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "PG Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Enviados: Sábado, 19 de Septiembre 2009 6:33:36 GMT -10:00 Hawai
Asunto: Re: [HACKERS] Crypto
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:50:35AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> What benefit would we gain from making general crypto part of the
>> core?
> People may wish to encrypt things in the database.
That is not an argument why it has to be in core rather than an add-on.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2009-09-19 17:48:13 | Re: WIP: generalized index constraints |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-19 17:21:10 | Standalone backends run StartupXLOG in an incorrect environment |