| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SSI and Hot Standby |
| Date: | 2011-01-20 02:50:10 |
| Message-ID: | 1295491810.1803.1105.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 19:34 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> I agree it's pretty late in the cycle, but I'm going through all the
> loose ends and found this one -- which has been hanging out on the
> Wiki page as an R&D item for over a full year without discussion.
> :-( If we provide the snapshots (which we can safely and easily
> do), can someone else who knows what they're doing with WAL and HS
> get the rest of it safely into the release? That seems to me to be
> the only way it can still happen for 9.1.
I gave you a quick response to let you know that HS need not be a
blocker, for this release. If you are saying you have knowingly ignored
a requirement for a whole year, then I am shocked. How exactly did you
think this would ever be committed?
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-01-20 02:55:42 | Re: SSI and Hot Standby |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2011-01-20 02:48:19 | Re: REVIEW: "writable CTEs" - doc patch |