Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups
Date: 2011-01-18 18:36:13
Message-ID: 1295375773.3282.5783.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 18:03 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> So it'd be pg_receive_wal and pg_receive_base_backup then?

OK for me.

Maybe even pg_receive_wal_stream

Don't see any reason why command names can't be long. We have many
function names already that long.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2011-01-18 18:42:59 Re: [PERFORM] pgbench to the MAXINT
Previous Message Andreas Karlsson 2011-01-18 18:35:44 Re: psql: Add \dL to show languages