Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug
Date: 2000-01-13 16:40:32
Message-ID: 12949.947781632@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> writes:
> Why was the ":" used in the first place ? I would expect to use a ','
> for an array slice. No ?

I'd think a comma is a separator between subscripts for different
dimensions, ie, a[1,2] would be equivalent to a[1][2]. It'd
certainly surprise *me* if it were interpreted as a slice indicator.

In any case, we're stuck with the notation now, I fear.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adriaan Joubert 2000-01-13 16:42:31 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-01-13 16:34:31 Re: [HACKERS] FETCH without FROM/IN