From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ALTER TYPE 0: Introduction; test cases |
Date: | 2011-01-11 09:24:46 |
Message-ID: | 1294737886.12610.5439.camel@ebony |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 16:59 -0500, Noah Misch wrote:
> This begins the patch series for the design I recently proposed[1] for avoiding
> some table rewrites in ALTER TABLE ... ALTER COLUMN ... TYPE. I'm posting these
> patches today:
These sound very good.
I have a concern that by making the ALTER TABLE more complex that we
might not be able to easily tell if a rewrite happens, or not.
Perhaps we should add a WITHOUT REWRITE clause? That would allow a user
to specify that they do not wish a rewrite, so if the AT requires them
to have one it would then fail.
You might point out I didn't do anything like that for my ALTER TABLE
patch, and I would agree with you. WITHOUT ACCESS EXCLUSIVE LOCK might
be an option here also.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2011-01-11 09:46:16 | Re: LOCK for non-tables |
Previous Message | Shigeru HANADA | 2011-01-11 09:20:14 | Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw |