From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: WIP: Range Types |
Date: | 2011-01-06 17:32:29 |
Message-ID: | 1294335149.18031.3524.camel@jdavis |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 12:07 -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
> The current design for range types doesn't ask for add or subtract.
> Although it might be interesting to try to use such an interface for
> range types, it introduces a lot of complexity and makes it easier to
> cause subtle problems (consider that addition of timestamps and
> intervals is not commutative).
A consequence of this design is that some generic range functions, like
"length" or "distance" would need to rely on the polymorphism of "+" and
"-" to work.
I'm also not sure if a constructor like "range(start, offset) returns
anyrange" could be made to work generically at all, because the start
and offset may be two different types (and a function that takes
ANYELEMENT requires that all ANYELEMENT arguments are the same type).
Does anyone see a problem with that?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-06 17:35:08 | Re: WIP: Range Types |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-06 17:27:10 | Re: Something fishy about the current Makefiles |