Re: "writable CTEs"

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "writable CTEs"
Date: 2010-12-28 14:35:26
Message-ID: 1293546926.9478.1.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tis, 2010-12-28 at 00:19 +0000, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> It's worth noting that officially (i.e. in the docs), we don't even
> call CTEs CTEs at any point. We call them WITH queries. I think that
> that's a mistake because we call them CTEs everywhere else.

I think "WITH query" or "WITH clause" is more understandable than CTE,
which to me is a term that has no relationship with anything else.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-12-28 14:47:19 Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2010-12-28 14:08:36 Re: "writable CTEs"