Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions
Date: 2010-12-27 13:25:29
Message-ID: 1293456329.1193.63371.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 12:00 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:34, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 10:36 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> > Is backup part of this new privilege, or not?
> >>
> >> The "integrated base backup", once we have that, that's based on the
> >> walsender protocol? yes.
> >> pg_dump style backups? No.
> >
> > Where does pg_start_backup()/stop fit?
>
> Good question :)
>
> Given that the integrated-base-backup would call it for you, that one
> would definitely get it automatically.
>
> Given that the latest discissions seem to have most people wanting the
> replication role *not* to be allowed to log in and run general SQL, we
> should not drive the start/stop backup permissions from that
> privilege.

So what your suggesting would actually defeat the purpose of having the
new privilege. Unless we trust in a new, untried method. Hmmm.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-12-27 13:39:02 Re: Recovery conflict monitoring
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2010-12-27 12:27:51 Re: MULTISET patch