Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions
Date: 2010-12-27 08:32:21
Message-ID: 1293438742.1193.61839.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 10:53 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> Here's a patch that changes walsender to require a special privilege
> for replication instead of relying on superuser permissions. We
> discussed this back before 9.0 was finalized, but IIRC we ran out of
> time. The motivation being that you really want to use superuser as
> little as possible - and since being a replication slave is a read
> only role, it shouldn't require the maximum permission available in
> the system.

Is backup part of this new privilege, or not?

I think if we're going to introduce a new level of privilege, then we
should introduce all delegatable privs in one software release. Much
better than having someone think up a new delegatable priv each release
for next 5 years.

Other possible ones include unsafe PL creation, seeing logged SQL etc..

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2010-12-27 08:53:06 Re: sepgsql contrib module
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-12-27 08:22:11 Re: unlogged tables v5