Re: group by function, make SQL cleaner?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bryce Nesbitt <bryce1(at)obviously(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: group by function, make SQL cleaner?
Date: 2006-03-16 06:04:58
Message-ID: 12933.1142489098@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Bryce Nesbitt <bryce1(at)obviously(dot)com> writes:
> SELECT date_trunc('day',endtime),count(*)
> FROM eg_event where endtime >= '2006-02-01' and endtime < '2006-03-01'
> GROUP BY date_trunc('day',endtime)
> ORDER BY date_trunc('day',endtime);

> Is there a way to eliminate the ugly repeated use of
> date_trunc('day',endtime)?

In this particular case you could say

... GROUP BY 1 ORDER BY 1;

"ORDER BY n" as a reference to the n'th SELECT output column is in the
SQL92 spec. (IIRC they removed it in SQL99, but we still support it,
and I think most other DBMSes do too.) "GROUP BY n" is *not* in any
version of the spec but we allow it anyway. I'm not sure how common
that notation is.

This does not work in any context except repeating a SELECT result
expression in GROUP BY or ORDER BY.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Becker 2006-03-16 06:46:27 Re: group by function, make SQL cleaner?
Previous Message Bryce Nesbitt 2006-03-16 05:18:40 group by function, make SQL cleaner?