From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bryce Nesbitt <bryce1(at)obviously(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: group by function, make SQL cleaner? |
Date: | 2006-03-16 06:04:58 |
Message-ID: | 12933.1142489098@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Bryce Nesbitt <bryce1(at)obviously(dot)com> writes:
> SELECT date_trunc('day',endtime),count(*)
> FROM eg_event where endtime >= '2006-02-01' and endtime < '2006-03-01'
> GROUP BY date_trunc('day',endtime)
> ORDER BY date_trunc('day',endtime);
> Is there a way to eliminate the ugly repeated use of
> date_trunc('day',endtime)?
In this particular case you could say
... GROUP BY 1 ORDER BY 1;
"ORDER BY n" as a reference to the n'th SELECT output column is in the
SQL92 spec. (IIRC they removed it in SQL99, but we still support it,
and I think most other DBMSes do too.) "GROUP BY n" is *not* in any
version of the spec but we allow it anyway. I'm not sure how common
that notation is.
This does not work in any context except repeating a SELECT result
expression in GROUP BY or ORDER BY.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Becker | 2006-03-16 06:46:27 | Re: group by function, make SQL cleaner? |
Previous Message | Bryce Nesbitt | 2006-03-16 05:18:40 | group by function, make SQL cleaner? |