Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 12/02/2012 10:05 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Personally I always thought that was a feature not a bug. If we give
>> each one its own DB, there will be a couple of dozen databases
>> cluttering the installation at the end of "make installcheck", and no
>> convenient way to get rid of them.
> How about if we have a make target to clean these databases out,
> "installcheck-clean", maybe? Alternatively, or in addition, how about if
> we have a separate make target to do things the way I'm suggesting,
> assuming I can make that work?
Either of those would satisfy my concern. The latter might be a bit
easier, not sure.
regards, tom lane