From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Shigeru HANADA <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SQL/MED - core functionality |
Date: | 2010-12-22 16:14:47 |
Message-ID: | 1293034487.1193.28610.camel@ebony |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 07:36 -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> >
> > > > 7. Why does ANALYZE skip foreign tables? Surely its really
> > > > important we know things about a foreign table, otherwise we are
> > > > going to optimize things very badly.
> > >
> > > Quite apart from other reasons, such as possible ephemerality of
> > > the data, the difficulty of taking a reasonable random sample from
> > > an arbitrary foreign data source seems substantial, and we surely
> > > don't want ANALYSE to have to run a full sequential scan of a
> > > foreign data source.
> >
> > I think we need something that estimates the size of a table, at
> > least, otherwise queries will be completely un-optimised.
>
> The estimated size for a lot of things--streams of data, for
> example--is infinity. I suppose that's a good default for some cases.
A fairly gross estimate will be all that is required.
Without it, we'd better be looking at some advanced query-cancel
support, cos the "17 hours and still going" events of previous SQL
gateway products seems to be looming in my rear view mirror.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-12-22 16:23:50 | Re: How much do the hint bits help? |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2010-12-22 16:14:01 | Re: How much do the hint bits help? |