| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ps_status on fastpath |
| Date: | 2010-12-17 21:19:21 |
| Message-ID: | 1292620498-sup-7971@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie dic 17 12:41:06 -0300 2010:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> > I noticed that the fastpath code doesn't update ps_status, which would
> > be harmless except that it leads to "idle in transaction" being logged
> > in log_line_prefix for the command tag.
>
> > Are there objections to applying this?
>
> Hm, what about pgstat_report_activity()?
Just noticed that it's already handled in postgres.c, before calling
HandleFunctionRequest. Probably not worth messing with.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-12-17 21:21:48 | Re: ps_status on fastpath |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-12-17 21:17:56 | Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST |