Re: Detection of hadware feature => please do not use signal

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Bastien Roucariès <rouca(at)debian(dot)org>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Detection of hadware feature => please do not use signal
Date: 2024-10-31 18:25:34
Message-ID: 1292593.1730399134@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> writes:
> On 31/10/2024 19:48, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Maybe we could do it one way on linux and the other way everywhere
>> else, but I do not find that attractive; it just makes it harder
>> to get full test coverage.

> Bastien, would you happen to know how other portable libraries that need
> to run on other operating system do this? We added the SIGILL probe back
> in 2018, there might be better options available now.

It occurs to me to wonder whether the existing code works on Windows.
Windows-on-ARM wasn't a thing we thought about in 2018, but it's
a reasonable target now.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tyler 2024-10-31 18:34:38 Column changes such as an increase in varchar size, can cause extremely slow queries, and postgres should run analyze automatically.
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2024-10-31 18:01:41 Re: Detection of hadware feature => please do not use signal