Re: pglz compression performance, take two

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pglz compression performance, take two
Date: 2020-12-26 18:07:41
Message-ID: 1292319.1609006061@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On 12/26/20 8:06 AM, Andrey Borodin wrote:
>> I'm still in doubt should I register this patch on CF or not. I'm willing to work on this, but it's not clear will it hit PGv14. And I hope for PGv15 we will have lz4 or something better for WAL compression.

> I'd suggest registering it, otherwise people are much less likely to
> give you feedback. I don't see why it couldn't land in PG14.

Even if lz4 or something else shows up, the existing code will remain
important for TOAST purposes. It would be years before we lose interest
in it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-12-26 18:24:04 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2020-12-26 18:00:16 Re: Rethinking plpgsql's assignment implementation