| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: usleep feature for pgbench |
| Date: | 2007-07-07 03:13:31 |
| Message-ID: | 12923.1183778011@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Jan Wieck wrote:
>> You mean as a second, optional argument? Good idea.
>>
>> us = microseconds
>> ms = milliseconds
>> s = seconds (default)
>>
>> \sleep {value|:variable} [us|ms|s]
>>
>> Is that okay with everyone?
> I won't object, but is it really worth the trouble?
If we don't get it right now, we'll be stuck with the API later.
+1 for the definition suggested above.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-07-07 03:29:42 | Checkpoints and buffers that are hint-bit-dirty |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-07-07 00:19:45 | Re: Updated tsearch documentation |