Re: Hot Standby btree delete records and vacuum_defer_cleanup_age

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hot Standby btree delete records and vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
Date: 2010-12-09 07:52:11
Message-ID: 1291881131.2872.1982.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 00:39 +0100, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> vacuum_defer_cleanup_age should take effect in
> the master, not during recovery.

Hmmm, more to the point, it does take effect on the master and so there
is no need for this at all. What were you thinking? What was I? Doh.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2010-12-09 07:55:46 Re: Hot Standby btree delete records and vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
Previous Message Jie Li 2010-12-09 07:26:09 Why percent_rank is so slower than rank?