Re: unlogged tables

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unlogged tables
Date: 2010-12-08 15:19:07
Message-ID: 1291821547.2872.920.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 13:17 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm also going to go through and change all instances of the word
> > "unlogged" to "volatile", per previous discussion. If this seems like
> > a bad idea to anyone, please object now rather than afterwards.
>
> Hm... I thought there had been discussion of a couple of different
> flavors of table volatility. Is it really a good idea to commandeer
> the word "volatile" for this particular one?

Note that DB2 uses the table modifier VOLATILE to indicate a table that
has a widely fluctuating table size, for example a queue table. It's
used as a declarative optimizer hint. So the term has many possible
meanings.

Prefer UNLOGGED or similar descriptive term.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2010-12-08 15:20:49 Re: Solving sudoku using SQL
Previous Message Marti Raudsepp 2010-12-08 15:14:18 Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and data=journalled on ext4