Re: crash-safe visibility map, take three

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: crash-safe visibility map, take three
Date: 2010-12-03 00:40:44
Message-ID: 1291336844.32238.4.camel@jdavis-ux.asterdata.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 19:06 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I don't think that you can seriously suggest that emitting that volume
> of FPIs isn't going to be a problem immediately. We have to have some
> solution to that problem out of the gate.

Fair enough. I think you understand my point, and it's easy enough to
remove complexity later if it makes sense to do so.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-12-03 00:48:33 Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-12-03 00:32:44 Re: should we set hint bits without dirtying the page?