Re: Fwd: [pgsql-www] Forums at postgresql.com.au

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Elliot Chance <elliotchance(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fwd: [pgsql-www] Forums at postgresql.com.au
Date: 2010-11-22 03:39:08
Message-ID: 1290397148.10258.12420.camel@jd-desktop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 10:40 +1100, Elliot Chance wrote:

> > I would argue that if the person wants to use a forum, aren't they
> > saying they don't want to be contacted via email. I think we just throw
> > it only to the forum (that is the user) and leave it that. Forum users
> > don't get the _rich_ email experience. ;-)
>
> It does surprise me a bit that when I (or someone else) signs up to a mailing list (not postgres specifically) that there is no fine print or agreement that says something along the lines of "Your email address will be plastered all over the internet, guaranteed to be picked up by spiders, make sure you have a good anti-spam."
>
> This doesn't so much bother me because the address I use on the mailing list is public and already on googles index but I bet some people don't like it, and once they realise its too late you can't remove emails from a mailing list. Forums are designed to act as the barrier that stops anyone from getting your address if you so choose.

Isn't this kind of the disclaimer for the Internet as a whole?

JD

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kent Tong 2010-11-22 03:43:38 Re: shared data for different applications
Previous Message KM 2010-11-22 00:43:47 Re: SYSCONFDIR, initdb and postgresql.conf