From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: unlogged tables |
Date: | 2010-11-16 22:15:47 |
Message-ID: | 1289945747.10258.2955.camel@jd-desktop |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 14:00 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Yeah, you'd have to allow a flag to control the behavior. And in that
> > case I'd rather the flag have a single default rather than different
> > defaults depending on whether or not individual tables were selected.
> > Something like --omit-unlogged-data.
>
> Are you sure we don't want to default the other way? It seems to me
> that most people using unlogged tables won't want to back them up ...
+1
JD
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-11-16 22:19:25 | Re: MULTISET and additional functions for ARRAY |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-11-16 22:12:10 | Re: unlogged tables |