From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Bernd Helmle" <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Show INHERIT in \du |
Date: | 2008-03-21 03:51:45 |
Message-ID: | 12894.1206071505@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 21/03/2008, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> The code is now set up so that it can pass an entire field value
>> through gettext(), but if gettext recognizes the strings "foo" and
>> "bar" that doesn't mean it will do anything useful with "foo\nbar",
>> which is what this patch would require.
> Ouch!
> We can't just build the output table by hand like
> describeOneTableDetails does? Admittedly it's kludgy, but it's not an
> unprecedented kludge.
Oh, I had forgotten the existence of that entry point in print.c. Yeah,
it might be workable --- want to have a go at it?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brendan Jurd | 2008-03-21 04:09:25 | Re: [PATCHES] Show INHERIT in \du |
Previous Message | Brendan Jurd | 2008-03-21 03:45:50 | Re: [PATCHES] Show INHERIT in \du |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brendan Jurd | 2008-03-21 04:09:25 | Re: [PATCHES] Show INHERIT in \du |
Previous Message | Brendan Jurd | 2008-03-21 03:45:50 | Re: [PATCHES] Show INHERIT in \du |