From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fix for seg picksplit function |
Date: | 2010-11-10 13:27:54 |
Message-ID: | 1289394705-sup-7337@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hmm, the second for loop in gseg_picksplit uses "i < maxoff" whereas the
other one uses <=. The first is probably correct; if the second is also
correct it merits a comment on the discrepancy (To be honest, I'd get
rid of the "-1" in computing maxoff and use < in both places, given that
offsets are 1-indexed). Also, the second one is using i++ to increment;
probably should be OffsetNumberNext just to stay consistent with the
rest of the code.
The assignment to *left and *right at the end of the routine seem pretty
useless (not to mention the comment talking about a routine that doesn't
exist anywhere).
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-11-10 13:31:06 | Re: multi-platform, multi-locale regression tests |
Previous Message | Viktor Valy | 2010-11-10 11:32:10 | Re: TODO Alter Table Rename Constraint |