Re: Should we use make -k on the buildfarm?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we use make -k on the buildfarm?
Date: 2010-11-08 20:05:57
Message-ID: 1289246757.502.14.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On mån, 2010-11-08 at 15:01 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> First, the buildfarm doesn't build the docs. That's a deliberate
> decision, based on the fact that not every member has the required
> software installed. And second these targets only exist for 9.0 and/or
> later.

I'm aware of those issues. I'm just saying you could consolidate things
along those lines in the long term.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-11-08 20:07:43 Re: UNION ALL has higher cost than inheritance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-11-08 20:05:16 Re: UNION ALL has higher cost than inheritance