From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Large SGML Cleanup |
Date: | 2010-11-03 14:24:38 |
Message-ID: | 1288794278.20884.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On tis, 2010-11-02 at 22:56 -0400, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> This HTML fails validation, as one isn't supposed to be stuffing
> tables inside <p> nodes. The attached patch fixes all the instances of
> this I could find, by closing out <para> nodes before beginning lists
> and tables.
Um, this is like moving around the C code because the compiler generates
invalid assembly code. Fix the compiler.
That said, we have the following in stylesheet.dsl:
;; Block elements are allowed in PARA in DocBook, but not in P in
;; HTML. With %fix-para-wrappers% turned on, the stylesheets attempt
;; to avoid putting block elements in HTML P tags by outputting
;; additional end/begin P pairs around them.
(define %fix-para-wrappers% #t)
So evidently someone thought of this before and put something in to
prevent some/many/most cases.
In general, I think the more efficient way to address this overall
problem is to run the resulting HTML through tidy and be done with it.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-11-03 14:25:58 | Re: Large SGML Cleanup |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-11-03 13:19:47 | Re: Large SGML Cleanup |