Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons
Date: 2010-11-02 07:13:58
Message-ID: 1288682038.30827.2.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On sön, 2010-10-31 at 22:41 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> * I renamed pg_[il]toa to pg_s(16|32|64)toa - I found the names
> confusing. Not sure if its worth it.

Given that there are widely established functions atoi() and atol(),
naming the reverse itoa() and ltoa() makes a lot of sense. The changed
versions read like "string to ASCII".

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-11-02 07:28:06 Re: SR fails to send existing WAL file after off-line copy
Previous Message Vaibhav Kaushal 2010-11-02 06:34:35 Fwd: Starting off with the development