| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: type info refactoring |
| Date: | 2010-10-31 22:04:24 |
| Message-ID: | 1288562664.5712.18.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On sön, 2010-10-31 at 13:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> But I'm still wondering whether it's smart to try to promote all of
> this fundamentally-auxiliary information to first-class status. It's
> really unclear to me that that will end up being a net win either
> conceptually or notationally.
Fair enough, but this patch arose from the discussion that the collation
patch had a lot of hunks that just changed (typeid, typmod) to (typeid,
typmod, collation) and that that could be isolated by collecting those
into a common data structure. We can abandon this line of thought and
I'll go back to my original project, but I thought others who are
thinking about improving typmods could also benefit from this work.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2010-10-31 22:09:23 | Re: ALTER OBJECT any_name SET SCHEMA name |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-31 22:02:55 | Re: ALTER OBJECT any_name SET SCHEMA name |