| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: crash in plancache with subtransactions |
| Date: | 2010-10-29 20:28:11 |
| Message-ID: | 1288383478-sup-8441@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie oct 29 12:54:52 -0300 2010:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > I tried the original test cases that were handed to me (quite different
> > from what I submitted here) and they are fixed also. Thanks.
>
> It'd be interesting to know if there's any noticeable slowdown on
> affected real-world cases. (Of course, if they invariably crashed
> before, there might not be a way to measure their previous speed...)
Yeah, the cases that were reported failed with one of
ERROR: invalid memory alloc request size 18446744073482534916
ERROR: could not open relation with OID 0
ERROR: buffer 228 is not owned by resource owner Portal
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2010-10-29 23:31:50 | Re: sorted writes for checkpoints |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-10-29 20:23:36 | Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ... |