| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: max_wal_senders must die |
| Date: | 2010-10-27 19:10:58 |
| Message-ID: | 1288206658.1587.2119.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 10:05 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> Josh has completely failed to make a case that
> >> that should be the default.
> >
> > Agreed.
>
> In what way have a failed to make a case?
I just removed a huge hurdle on the journey to simplification. That
doesn't mean I think you have come up with an acceptable solution,
though there probably is one.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-10-27 19:33:55 | Re: max_wal_senders must die |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2010-10-27 18:51:23 | Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle |