| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: is sync rep stalled? |
| Date: | 2010-09-30 16:52:46 |
| Message-ID: | 1285865566.1921.1270.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 07:06 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:52:46AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:14:42AM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > >> I don't see anything has stalled.
> >
> > > I do. We're half way through this commitfest, so if no one's
> > > actually ready to commit one of the patches, I kinda have to
> > > bounce them both, at least to the next CF.
> >
> > [ raised eyebrow ] You seem to be in an awfully big hurry to bounce
> > stuff. The CF end is still two weeks away.
>
> If people are still wrangling over the design, I'd say two weeks is
> a ludicrously short time, not a long one.
Yes, there is design work still to do.
What purpose would be served by "bouncing" these patches?
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-09-30 18:02:01 | Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-09-30 15:25:11 | Re: Using streaming replication as log archiving |