Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Leonardo Francalanci <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it>
Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
Date: 2010-09-29 12:41:20
Message-ID: 1285764013-sup-7095@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Leonardo Francalanci's message of mié sep 29 03:17:07 -0400 2010:

> Here's my post with a (very simple) performance test:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-02/msg00766.php

I think the 10M rows test is more in line with what we want (83s vs. 646).

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shigeru HANADA 2010-09-29 12:43:09 Re: patch: SQL/MED(FDW) DDL
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2010-09-29 12:09:48 Re: Git downed?