| From: | novnovice <novnovice(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Merge replication with Postgresql on Windows? |
| Date: | 2010-09-28 03:08:00 |
| Message-ID: | 1285643280069-2856176.post@n5.nabble.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Can anyone recommend a relatively simple merge replication package that would
work well on windows and which relies on one of the current postgresql
versions? 9 would be fine for my needs. I'm a fairly unsophisticated
postgresql user; and not very experienced with replication on other
databases. So the simplest to configure and maintain solution would be best.
I am not sure but it sounds like the new replication features that come
baked in to postgres 9 are not so oriented towards merge replication - is
that right?
My use case would involve a primary postgresql database and several
postgresql databases on disconnected notebook computers. All dbs need to be
able to support updates inserts etc; and then hopefully the replication
software would help with things like conflict resolution.
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Merge-replication-with-Postgresql-on-Windows-tp2856176p2856176.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tim Uckun | 2010-09-28 03:20:15 | Re: Deleting orphaned records (not exists is very slow) |
| Previous Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2010-09-28 02:48:56 | Re: Deleting orphaned records (not exists is very slow) |