| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Configuring synchronous replication |
| Date: | 2010-09-22 11:50:44 |
| Message-ID: | 1285156244.15691.38.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 12:20 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > No, it's really not hierarchical. It only has goes one level deep.
>
> I guess pgAdmin/wxWidgets are broken then :-)
>
> [Servers]
> Count=5
> [Servers/1]
> Server=localhost
Well, by that logic, even what we have now for postgresql.conf is
hierarchical.
I think the criterion was rather meant to be
- can represent hierarchies without repeating intermediate node names
(Note: no opinion on which format is better for the task at hand)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-09-22 11:57:00 | Re: Configuring synchronous replication |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2010-09-22 11:20:29 | Re: Configuring synchronous replication |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-09-22 11:54:42 | Re: snapshot generation broken |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-09-22 11:48:39 | Re: Multi-branch committing in git, revisited |