| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "A(dot)M(dot)" <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: sql DO in rule 9.0rc1 |
| Date: | 2010-09-10 17:44:17 |
| Message-ID: | 1284140657.5188.2.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 13:39 -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> IDK...functions do everything 'DO' does, and support returning data,
> which is necessary to support RETURNING. Rules are already fairly
> capricious and problematic and I doubt any proposal that doesn't fix
> or work around their basic flaws will get much traction.
Not to mention there have been talks of ripping them out all together.
JD
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-10 18:14:09 | Re: Frustration with \copy |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2010-09-10 17:39:16 | Re: sql DO in rule 9.0rc1 |