| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | tamanna madaan <tamanna(dot)madan(at)globallogic(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: error while autovacuuming |
| Date: | 2010-09-08 21:33:47 |
| Message-ID: | 1283981545-sup-5465@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Excerpts from tamanna madaan's message of mié sep 08 17:10:23 -0400 2010:
> Actually, I have a cluster setup with two nodes in it. I am having
> postgres-8.1.2 and am using slony-1.1.5 for replication between two
> nodes in that cluster. Now, If I plan to upgrade both the servers to
> postgres-8.1.21, I will be doing it one by one . When one system is
> upgraded to postgres-8.1.21 , other will still be on postgres-8.1.2
> until its also upgraded.
>
> So I was just wondering if there wont be any issue with replication
> using slony-1.1.5 from postgres-8.1.2 to postgres-8.1.21 .
>
> Second question : Will slony 1.1.5 work with postgres-8.1.21 or I'll
> have to upgrade slony as well.
8.1.21 is identical to 8.1.2 as far as Slony is concerned. It just
contains a few bug fixes, such as the one that affects you.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2010-09-08 21:48:41 | Re: exclusion constraint with overlapping timestamps |
| Previous Message | tamanna madaan | 2010-09-08 21:10:23 | Re: error while autovacuuming |