| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump order of operation |
| Date: | 2018-08-26 18:42:35 |
| Message-ID: | 12838.1535308955@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 08/26/2018 10:24 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> In what order does the 9.6 pg_dump dump tables?
>> I don't believe the ordering rules have changed materially since 8.4;
>> it's intended to be by object kind, and within that by name, except
>> where dependencies force doing something else.
> I thought that didn't matter, since FK and PK constraints were added (in the
> required order) after all data was loaded).
>> But what are you thinking constitutes the "dump order" in a parallel dump?
> I don't understand your question.
Perhaps I don't understand *your* question. What concrete problem are you
having?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron | 2018-08-26 19:26:38 | Re: pg_dump order of operation |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-08-26 18:39:50 | Re: "cache lookup failed for type ####" when running unit tests |