Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item
Date: 2010-08-24 20:53:45
Message-ID: 1282683225.11634.68.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 13:44 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 8/24/10 12:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> writes:
> >> Is this method not reliable then? Can something go wrong even if the
> >> user does exactly what the documentation says?
> >
> > It is not. This whole discussion started from somebody reporting that
> > it didn't work.
>
> Again, given that this is a method which is (a) fairly minority-need,
> and (b) not at all tested in the field, I do not think it belongs in the
> main docs. Let's put it on the wiki and blog about it, and AFTER we've
> collected bug reports and have something relatively bulletproof for 9.1,
> THEN we put it in the main docs.
>
> We really shouldn't have anything in the main docs related to backup
> which isn't 100% tested.

+1

JD

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-08-24 20:54:43 Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-08-24 20:53:35 Re: [BUGS] BUG #5305: Postgres service stops when closing Windows session