From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [cstdenis@ctgameinfo.com: Re: BUG #3179: crash when canceling avacuum] |
Date: | 2007-03-21 18:13:08 |
Message-ID: | 12825.1174500788@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> ----- Forwarded message from Cstdenis <cstdenis(at)ctgameinfo(dot)com> -----
> Mar 20 22:29:48 ayu postgres[60274]: [1-1] ERROR: canceling statement due
> to user request
> Mar 20 22:29:48 ayu postgres[60274]: [1-2] STATEMENT: VACUUM FULL VERBOSE
> ANALYZE;
> Mar 20 22:29:48 ayu postgres[60274]: [2-1] PANIC: cannot abort
> transaction 293233494, it was already committed
Oh, this is a well-known problem: VACUUM FULL plays a game it shouldn't
be playing with marking its transaction committed before it's really done.
I think we now have enough infrastructure to clean this up by turning
a VACUUM FULL into two successive transactions, but haven't got round to
looking at it in detail.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-03-21 23:01:02 | Re: Very slow bytea extraction |
Previous Message | msmbarabino@virgilio.it | 2007-03-21 18:00:27 | Very slow bytea extraction |