Re: Replacing the pg_get_expr security hack with a datatype solution

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replacing the pg_get_expr security hack with a datatype solution
Date: 2010-08-22 15:57:21
Message-ID: 1282492641.13679.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On lör, 2010-08-21 at 15:30 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The only thing that seems like it might need discussion is the name
> to give the datatype. My first instinct was pg_expr or pg_expression,
> but there are some cases where this doesn't exactly fit. In
> particular,
> pg_rewrite.ev_action contains a whole Query, in fact a list of them.

Perhaps pg_node then.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-08-22 16:01:48 Re: More vacuum stats
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-08-22 15:54:05 Re: pg_archivecleanup debug message consistency