Re: security label support, part.2

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: security label support, part.2
Date: 2010-08-17 04:28:24
Message-ID: 1282019304.10562.5.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tis, 2010-08-17 at 13:00 +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> However, isn't it strange if we stand on the perspective that child
> table is a part of parent object? It means an object have multiple
> properties depending on the context.

Such is the nature of inheritance, isn't it?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2010-08-17 05:14:25 Re: security label support, part.2
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2010-08-17 04:00:02 Re: security label support, part.2