| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
| Subject: | Re: fulltext parser strange behave |
| Date: | 2007-11-08 01:11:37 |
| Message-ID: | 12819.1194484297@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, the state machine definitely thinks that tag names should contain
>> only ASCII letters (with possibly a leading or trailing '/'). Given the
>> HTML examples I suppose we should allow non-first digits too. Is there
>> anything else that should be considered a tag? What about dash and
>> underscore for instance?
> The docs say we specifically accept HTML tags. Are we really just
> accepting anything that is a string of ASCII letters as the tag name?
> Then we should adjust the docs. <foo> and <foo1234> are not HTML tags.
I don't think I want to try to maintain a list of exactly which
identifiers are considered valid tag names ... and if I did, I wouldn't
put it into the parser. It would be a dictionary's job to tell valid
from invalid tag names, no?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-08 01:31:34 | Re: Throw error and ErrorContext question. |
| Previous Message | Radoslaw Zielinski | 2007-11-08 00:48:12 | Re: Beta2 crash / create type + tsearch2 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-11-08 02:01:57 | Re: fulltext parser strange behave |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-11-07 23:38:33 | Re: fulltext parser strange behave |