| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Boxuan Zhai <bxzhai2010(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: MERGE command for inheritance |
| Date: | 2010-08-11 11:44:00 |
| Message-ID: | 1281527040.2142.1527.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 13:25 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> I concur that Boxuan's suggested "difficult" approach seems like the
> right one.
Right, but you've completely ignored my proposal: lets do this in two
pieces. Get what we have now ready to commit, then add support for
partitioning later, as a second project.
Two reasons for this: we endanger the current project by adding more to
it in one go, plus work on other aspects of partitioning is happening
concurrently and the two are likely to conflict and/or waste effort.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Viktor Valy | 2010-08-11 11:47:17 | Re: Develop item from TODO list |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-08-11 10:55:29 | Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment |