pg_stat_user_functions' notion of user

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pg_stat_user_functions' notion of user
Date: 2010-08-05 13:58:32
Message-ID: 1281016712.15454.1.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

pg_stat_user_functions has an inconsistent notion of what "user" is.
Whereas the other pg_stat_user_* views filter out non-user objects by
schema, pg_stat_user_functions checks for language "internal", which
does not successfully exclude builtin functions of language SQL. Is
there a reason for this inconsistency?

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-08-05 13:59:23 Re: tracking inherited columns (was: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance)
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-08-05 13:56:32 Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues