| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [GENERAL] +/- Inf for float8's |
| Date: | 2001-06-05 04:21:02 |
| Message-ID: | 12810.991714862@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> writes:
> On a modestly related note, I'm come over to the notion that the
> date/time value 'current' could be ripped out eventually. Tom, isn't
> that the only case for those types which bolluxes up caching of
> date/time types?
Yes, I believe so. At least, that was the consideration that led me
to mark those functions noncachable ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-05 04:29:20 | Re: Mirrors not tracking main ftp site? |
| Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2001-06-05 03:46:34 | Re: Question about inheritance |