From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gerd Koenig <koenig(at)transporeon(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: problem with pg_standby |
Date: | 2010-08-03 21:09:16 |
Message-ID: | 1280869756.2025.29.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 22:37 +0200, Gerd Koenig wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we currently setup a standby database with archive_command sending the WALs
> from master to standby.
> This works as expected, but the standby database doesn't restore the WALs from
> the given directory in recovery.conf and I have no idea why...
What are you using to manage this? I would strongly suggest Walmgr or
PITRTools. They take a lot of the guess work out of all this stuff.
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Timothy Garnett | 2010-08-03 21:11:46 | Re: When can postgresql use a partial (NOT NULL) index? Seems to depend on size of IN clause (even with enable seqscan = off) |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2010-08-03 21:01:36 | Re: When can postgresql use a partial (NOT NULL) index? Seems to depend on size of IN clause (even with enable seqscan = off) |