| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Felipe de Jesús Molina Bravo <fjmolinabravo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: solaris slow |
| Date: | 2010-08-02 17:34:51 |
| Message-ID: | 1280770491.16244.31.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 14:35 +0000, Felipe de Jesús Molina Bravo wrote:
> Hi
>
> We design some performance tests (special for my application); this
> test was executed with pgbench:
>
> pgbench -c 5 -T 600 -n -U aeedc -f test.sql aeespc
>
You noted SCSI disks on solaris. They may not have the CACHE turned on,
on the drive. The SATA drives will have cache turned on and will be
faster.
That said, your results are slow as a whole.
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | steeles | 2010-08-02 17:38:52 | Need help on WAL configure |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-02 17:34:29 | Re: problem with ON UPDATE rule |