From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Tidy up boolean data type page |
Date: | 2010-07-24 12:18:08 |
Message-ID: | 1279973888.22066.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On tor, 2010-07-22 at 23:02 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wanted to clean up the boolean data type documentation page a bit,
> so thought the following was needed:
>
> - use a data type table like most of the other main data types so
> it's more uniform (the the size of a boolean is only mentioned at the
> very end and looks a bit odd, so removed that too)
> - move the reference to the usage example to before the example
> - minor text change in the first sentence so that it doesn't look
> like it reads "boolean.boolean"
>
> I've attached a patch with these changes, although feel free to list
> the many reasons why this is a bad idea. ;)
Looks good to me. Committed to 9.0 and 9.1.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-07-24 12:21:29 | Re: Adding a crucial element to an example |
Previous Message | Craig James | 2010-07-23 21:47:23 | Re: Using more tha one index per table |