Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Leonardo F <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it>, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
Date: 2010-07-07 15:41:47
Message-ID: 1278517246-sup-7265@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Takahiro Itagaki's message of mié jul 07 04:39:38 -0400 2010:

> BTW, we could have LogicalTapeReadExact() as an alias of
> LogicalTapeRead() and checking the result because we have
> many duplicated codes for "unexpected end of data" errors.

I'd just add a boolean "exact required" to the existing functions.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-07-07 16:40:10 Re: cvs to git migration - keywords
Previous Message Jan Urbański 2010-07-07 15:41:04 Re: Python Interface Hacking